The inconspicuous child and its development, observations and their interpretations
Affolter's first experiences in teaching children led to a conflict and corresponding questions: were the pedagogical instructions she received in teacher training a „matter of faith“ or were they based on „knowledge“? This left Affolter in a dilemma that she was to deal with time and again in her dealings with educationalists and psychologists: Which of their theories were based on observations and which on interpretations?
Concerned with this problem, she began studying child psychology with Jean Piaget at the University of Geneva. She graduated with the „Diplôme gėnėral en Psychologie“ and a degree in psychology.
Between her studies, Affolter taught at a speech therapy school for several years. This brought her into contact with deaf children and their acquisition of spoken language. This contact led to a further question: „How are language and thinking connected“?
Connection between the development of language and thinking
In addition to the deaf children, children with delayed speech development also came to the speech therapy school. These were children who could hear, but could not hear. At the time, they were referred to as „hearing mute“. Then there were other children who, for unknown reasons, had difficulties in developing their speech.
Two further aspects were added to the issue of „language and thinking“ in connection with deafness: „What does „hearing as perception“ mean?„ and “What does perception have to do with the development of language?".
Perception and language - prerequisites for the development of language
In political/cultural terms, the USA was in a spirit of optimism, as it was a Russian and not an American who had first ventured into space. The Americans with Kennedy as president wanted to catch up and increase their knowledge. This was expressed through openness and a willingness to engage in discussions with others. Affolter was very often asked for her opinion on what or how she, as a European, thought about this or that.
From a professional perspective, the advisors at the university put together an excellent study program for Affolter as soon as they learned of her interest in speech and hearing. Her main area of interest was the Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, including „Disorders of Communication“ with Professors Frank Lassman, Hildred Schuell and Jerry Siegel. There was also a summer session with Wever, a colleague of Békésy, on his hearing theories. There was also James Jenkins, a specialist in Affolter's secondary field of psycholinguistics. Jenkins came from the Department of Psychology. This was also the birthplace of Skinner's „behavioral theory“, which had also found its way into Switzerland with its „conditioning“ in the post-war years, driven by German psychologists.
Affolter's sponsors extended her scholarship period and made it possible for her to go on an additional study trip to schools for the deaf in various states in the USA.
After graduating with a Master of Sciences in audiology and speech pathology, Affolter returned to Switzerland. New tasks awaited her there, as Swiss disability insurance had come into force in the meantime. Suddenly, money was available for the early detection of children with speech development difficulties. Affolter was therefore able to apply her newly acquired knowledge: In the early assessment of children with speech difficulties, including hearing assessments and the fitting of hearing aids. In addition, Affolter was given a teaching position at the University of Fribourg's Institute of Special Education for Speech Therapy, including the founding of a pediatric audiology center at the Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen.
Affolter realized that such demands and the associated responsibility required further knowledge. She decided to continue her studies in the USA and obtain a „Ph. D.“ (philosophical doctorate). However, the situation in the USA had changed drastically in the academic and cultural environment since Kennedy's death and under the Nixon presidency. Their inquiries to various universities were answered negatively, with the explanation that there was no money for foreign students.
After much effort, Affolter finally obtained a position as an assistant at Pennsylvania State University, in the middle of the „nowhere of the Allegeny mountains“. She spent three years in Republican Pennsylvania and experienced a time that was very different from her time in Minnesota. It was the time of the so-called „68s“, a time of student unrest. These had begun in California and quickly spread to Ohio - and then to Pennsylvania at Penn State University. And there, Affolter and her doctoral program were caught in the middle of the maelstrom. For example, the defense of her dissertation had to be moved off campus at short notice because of the riots. Some time later, her doctoral program in „Speech Sciences“ was successfully completed (Affolter, 1970).
Shortly afterwards, she paid a farewell visit to her professors and friends at the University of Minnesota. Here she learned about the founding of a „Center for Human Learning“ at the University of Minnesota. The initiator was Prof. James Jenkins, her former advisor in psycholinguistics. For Affolter, it was like a small culmination of her time in the USA: as an antithesis to Skinner's „Behavior Modification“ with concepts such as frequency, reward/punishment, motivation - and countless laboratory experiments on rats, now a huge step further into the complexity of human learning.
Affolter returned to Switzerland in 1970. This marked the beginning of another important phase in his life: research related to clinical work, made possible by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), with a dynamic team of collaborators and a circle of stimulating professionals, in Switzerland and in the USA.
Clinical work and research
Perceptual disorders
In the 1980s, the research funded by the SNSF came to an end. Affolter now had a large amount of data that required in-depth analyses and interpretations and ultimately led to important publications (e.g. Affolter, 1987 or Affolter & Bischofberger, 2007).
During the National Fund period, contact with the Center for Human Learning at the University of Minnesota/USA had been maintained through a few short visits. Affolter now tried to intensify this contact and applied for the status of an „affiliate person“ with special conditions. Among other things, she was able to convert the obligatory multi-year stay at the Center for Human Learning into temporary annual three-month stays and extend this to an employee (from the St. Gallen team). This marked the beginning of the development of the „Affolter Model®“.
The Affolter Model®
In the course of clinical work, doubts about this model arose and became increasingly stronger. Research, including various cross-sectional studies and especially long-term data, could not be explained by this model of direct dependence between developmental stages. But no other model was available.
Affolter analyzed the results from the aforementioned cross-sectional studies and the long-term findings. She compared the performance of children with developmental disabilities and children with peripheral sensory impairments (blind and deaf children) with the performance of children with severe impairments in language development and children with profound developmental problems (e.g. autism). She was particularly interested in perceptual performance, cognitive performance, imitation, symbolic behavior, language and motor skills.
There was Piaget's theory with interaction as the basis of evolution. There was everyday life and also the „non-linguistic solving of problems in everyday life“ (Affolter & Bischofberger, 2007). Affolter began to speak of „interaction in everyday life“. She and her colleagues compiled countless observations. Together they analyzed and interpreted them, and they began to focus their clinical work more and more intensively on the findings.
Finally, the „growth of a tree with its root“ model was born. The tree grows thanks to its root and a suitable environment; branches grow from the root, one branch after the other, in a sequence, always directly dependent on the root.
Only with such a root/tree model was it possible to classify the data of the different test groups. The model can be used wherever development is involved, i.e. in normal children as well as in children with a developmental impairment, but also where the new acquisition or reacquisition of performance in acquired brain damage and the preservation and/or stimulation of brain functions in geriatric patients are concerned.
The practical-clinical collaboration with the „Affolter team“ at the Burgau/DE rehabilitation clinic was particularly intensive, also in the form of numerous courses.
The scientific collaboration with the Center for Human Learning (later Center for Cognitive Sciences) at the University of Minnesota/USA continued, with annual three-month visits. In a lively exchange with the experts there, various publications were and are still being produced that focus on theoretical aspects, but also on the practical application of the Affolter Model®.
In 1994, Affolter was named „Person of the Year in Infant Studies“ by Michigan State University in East Lansing and was also commissioned to give lectures and various seminars.
In 1996, Affolter was chosen by the same university for the so-called „Oyer lecture“ of the year. At the same time, she began her participation in a one-year symposium on „Movement and Action in Learning and Development“ under the heading „From Action to Interaction“ (Stockman, 2004). Dr. Ida Stockman, Professor in the Departments of Communication Disorders and Audiology at Michigan State University, was responsible for organizing and coordinating the special lectures and seminars given by various guest professors at the symposium.
In 2008, the Global Programs and Strategy Alliance (GPS Alliance) and the University of Minnesota Alumni Association (UMAA) of the University of Minnesota honored Affolter with the „Distinguished Leadership Award for Internationals“ for her life's work.
References
Affolter, F. (1987). Perception, reality and language. Villingen-Schwenningen: Neckar Verlag.
Affolter, F. & Bischofberger, W. (2007). Nonlinguistic problem solving in everyday situations in normal children and children with language disorders. Villingen-Schwenningen: Neckar Verlag.
Inhelder, B., Sinclair, H. and Bovet, M. (1974). Learning and the Development of Cognition. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Stockman, I. (2004). Movement and Action in Learning and Development. Clinical Implications for Pervasive Developmental Disorders. San Diego CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
https://global.umn.edu/honors/dlai/08_affolter.html): Distinguished Leadership Award for Internationals, 2008 Recipients: Dr. Félicie Affolter, Switzerland, M. S. Speech Pathology (1959).